The Moral ArgumentThe Argument StatedThis argument asserts first of all the moral nature of man. That is, we have a sense of right and wrong - what we ought and ought not to do. We feel justified when we do what we think is right and condemned when we do what we think is wrong. Since we follow moral law, it can be inferred that there must be a Lawgiver. We believe this Lawgiver is God - the God revealed in the Bible. The Argument AppliedWhere did this moral law come from - we should not steal, murder, lie and so on? If it did not come from a Divine source (source outside of ourselves) did it come from an individual, group of individuals or from some Supreme Matter? How would we decide what is right and wrong if the is no God and no Divine Law? All of us, whatever our moral judgments, would be "right" in our conclusions about what is good behavior. Our morals would be "relative" dependent on the times rather than eternal principle. Many times those who do not believe in God will boldly assert that there is no such thing as absolute moral truth. But, when they do this, they catch themselves in a self contradiction which says, "The absolute truth is that there is no absolute truth!" We believe God is the Giver of moral Law to mankind. And, all of our problems have come about because we have violated that moral Law (sinned). The ScripturesROM 1:21 For even though they knew God, they did not
honor Him as God, or give thanks; but they became futile in their speculations, and their
foolish heart was darkened. |